Why is it necessary to have both QAC and key officeholders such as KAH/PO/CGO?
Healthcare Services (General) Regulations, Committees appointed by licensee
The appointment of key officeholders strengthens the governance of the licensee and is applicable to all licensees. They ensure organisational processes of the licensee comply with all laws and regulations, including day-to-day operations and various aspects of the clinical services.
On the other hand, QACs are set up to evaluate and monitor the quality and appropriateness of the healthcare services provided by the licensee and are only required for prescribed licensees. QACs review incidents such as Serious Reportable Events (SREs) and recommend corrective actions.
The requirements on key officeholders and the QAC complement each other to enhance patient safety.
Related questions
Can key officeholders such as the KAH/PO/CGO take on concurrent appointments in the QAC?
How does a licensee ensure the QAC carries out its functions and duties when the members are appointed by the licensee and there may be conflict of interests?
Does the HCSA allow MOH to take action against all key appointment holders in the event of a serious lapse of governance controls e.g., a Hepatitis C outbreak? Under the HCSA, what will be the added governance for action against personnel responsible to prevent the recurrence of serious incidents?
Can a cluster appoint an overarching QAC to oversee services provided by all the healthcare institutions across the cluster?
Need more help?
Get in touch