Why must a State property be put up for tender when the current tenancy expires? Why are existing tenants not allowed to stay on?
.png){kind=avatar}
State properties pending long term development are let out for interim uses for a specified tenure. The available tenure for each property varies and is determined by the planning authority, depending on the development timeframe for the site.
Prior to expiry of an existing tenancy, SLA will consult the planning authority on whether further interim use of the State property can be supported. Where it can be supported, it is only fair that an open tender be called among all interested parties to decide on the allocation. The existing tenant is welcome to participate in the tender.
Prior to expiry of an existing tenancy, SLA will consult the planning authority on whether further interim use of the State property can be supported. Where it can be supported, it is only fair that an open tender be called among all interested parties to decide on the allocation. The existing tenant is welcome to participate in the tender.
Related questions
When a party bids for a State property, what is the tenure like?
Why is a tender launched even before the expiry of the existing tenancy?
If the existing tenant is unable to stay on, will SLA help in the relocation of the tenant to another available site?
Are there any exceptions for State properties to be renewed directly to existing tenants?
Need more help?
Get in touch