Why not introduce a COE surcharge, like an Additional Buyer's Stamp Duty, for those households with multiple cars?
Only 5% of households in Singapore own more than one car. An Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty (ABSD) on multi-car ownership based on residential address is difficult to implement. For example, in multi-generational households, such a measure would unintentionally affect families who may genuinely need more than one car for various reasons, including caregiving responsibilities. The families living in HDB flats would feel the impact most keenly, while wealthier households could more easily absorb the higher charges or register cars under different names or residential addresses. Furthermore, the COE clearing price is determined by the lowest, not the highest, winning bid. Therefore, a surcharge is not likely to affect COE prices significantly.
Progressivity is achieved through the vehicular tax system. Luxury car buyers already pay higher taxes through the Additional Registration Fee (ARF), based on the car’s Open Market Value. Cars with higher open market value pay higher ARF, with the highest tier rate of ARF set at 320%. The Government has also raised ARF rates twice in the last four years (in Budgets 2022 & 2023, after it was first introduced in 2013) to strengthen this progressivity.
Related questions
Why do we need the COE system?
2
Why are buyers subject to the prevailing PARF rebate at the point of registration based on the date the COE is obtained rather than at the point of sale? / Can the effective date be deferred to allow affected buyers time to adjust?
What affects COE prices? What is fuelling the high bids in 2025? Are our policy measures (e.g. the one-off injection of 20,000 COEs in Oct 2024 and the 'cut-and-fill' to bring forward COE quota from peak years) ineffective given rising COE prices?
Could large families or those with elderly members/young children/persons with disabilities receive priority or subsidies for COEs or subsidies?
Need more help?
Describe your issues to us.
